today i thought i'd share a post on revenge by Jordan Green.
I would generally consider myself a pacifist. I say “generally”,
because I don’t really know how I’d react in a given situation. If, for
instance, a crazed hobo woman attacked my daughter, I’m fairly certain I
would resort to physical violence in order to get her to stop. So maybe
I’m a pacifist when it comes to larger communities, like nation-states
and youth groups. Because of my semi-pacifist philosophy, I’ve always
had one major hang-up with narrative morality, an idea this blog’s
esteemed owner discusses in
A Million Miles in a Thousand Years. That hang-up is this: when played out in story, revenge is sort of awesome.
For instance, I’m reading through George R.R. Martin’s
A Song of Ice and Fire
series right now, and there are plenty of characters in this epic,
sprawling fantasy series who I want to pay. And I don’t want them merely
brought to justice in a court of law and imprisoned for life. They are
evil people, and I want them to die the most painful deaths possible.
Most of them
do end up dying horrific deaths, simply because (SPOILER ALERT) a lot of people die in these books.(END SPOILER ALERT)
Of course, the characters in Martin’s novels aren’t real, but real
life has its share of bad guys. The latter half of the 20th century
seemed to mark a turn away from Old Testament-style justice. Adolph
Hitler: committed suicide to avoid capture by the Red Army. Joseph
Stalin: died of a cerebral hemorrhage at 74. Pol Pot: died at home of a
heart attack. Slobodan Milosevic: heart attack while under trial for war
crimes. Saddam Hussein: hanged after being convicted for crimes against
humanity. The point is, the deaths of some of the 20th century’s worst
people were decidedly unlike that of your average Bond villain.
Then, in the last six months, Osama Bin Laden and Muammar Gaddafi
died extremely violent deaths. The former, of course, was shot in the
head during a raid by US forces. The latter was captured in a hole,
beaten viciously, and, according to some reports, took around 30 minutes
to die after being shot in the head and chest.
Now, I know I am supposed to love my enemies, to pray for them and
even bless them. I know this because it is discussed pointedly in
Romans, Luke, 1 Peter and 1 John. But what’s curious to me is how these
deaths
feel to me from a purely narrative standpoint. And, if
I’m honest, the deaths of Osama Bin Laden and Muammar Gaddafi feel
somewhat…well…right. As much as I tell myself the death of a human being
should never be celebrated, I do at least feel some satisfaction
knowing these men are gone. Gaddafi was a madman who ruled with an iron
hand, who lived in unchecked opulence while his people suffered. Osama
Bin Laden was Osama Bin Laden. One of the key components of Protestant
Christianity is the belief we do not get what we deserve, that through
following Christ all sin is absolved, but there is still a very real
part of us that wants to see certain people get what’s coming to them,
from cruel despots to schoolyard bullies. If narrative morality is
ingrained in us by our creator — and I think for the most part it is —
why is vengeance so undeniably gratifying?
The easiest answer is to say we want justice, and that’s partly true.
We yearn for God to put the world right. But there’s more to it than
that. One of my favorite stories takes place in Corrie Ten Boom’s book
Tramp for the Lord.
Ms. Ten Boom is lecturing in Germany when she is approached by a man
whom she quickly recognizes as a particularly brutal Ravensbruck guard.
Before he can speak, she forgives him:
“For a long moment, we grasped each other’s hands, the
former guard and the former prisoner. I had never known God’s love so
intensely as I did then.”
What we truly want is for villains to repent. Ideally, we want a
villain to understand what he did was wrong, and redeem his horrible
actions. When that doesn’t suffice, we want him to realize he was not as
powerful as he thought. This is why, when a villain dies in a story, we
are shown his reaction one last time as he plummets to his death or
realizes a bomb is about to explode. We want to see him recognize he is a
broken man.
The question from there is whether we want our villains forgiven, and
I suspect that’s a matter of perspective. Did anyone really want
Die Hard
to end with John McClane forgiving Hans Gruber, grasping hands, and
experiencing God’s love? Doubtful, but this is partly because Hans
Gruber is not a real human. He’s an avatar for evil. Real people are a
lot messier, with compounding factors like traumatic childhood
experiences and mental illness.
Like all sin, we each have our limits. The tools God gives us to push
those limits — empathy and a willingness to cede control of our lives —
are crucial in determining our reactions. If I had known Muammar
Gaddafi, or Osama Bin Laden, I wonder if that glimmer of satisfaction I
felt would’ve been diminished completely, and a story read as justice
served would more closely resemble a tragedy.